Tag

#SupremeCourtOfIndia
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, Order IX Rule 13 CPC Remedy Not Barred By Dismissal of Appeal
In Deepesh Maheshwari & Anr. v. Renu Maheshwari & Ors., the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has held that dismissal of an appeal against an ex-parte decree does not bar the maintainability of an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The dispute arose from succession proceedings initiated after...
Read More
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, Blacklisting Not Automatic Upon Contract Termination!
In M/s AKG Construction and Developers Private Limited v. State of Jharkhand & Ors., the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has held that blacklisting of a contractor is not an automatic consequence of termination of a contract and requires an independent application of mind along with adherence to the principles of natural justice. The dispute...
Read More
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India: ₹2983 Crore Claims Settled for ₹26 Crore in Insolvency. Proceedings, Notes from ED Report!
In EAS Sarma v. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) No. 1217 of 2025, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, while monitoring investigations into alleged financial irregularities involving companies of the Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group, noted from a report of the Enforcement Directorate that claims amounting to approximately ₹2,983 crores were settled in insolvency proceedings...
Read More
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India: No Arbitration Without Valid Agreement; Participation Does Not Confer Jurisdiction
M/s Bharat Udyog ltd. ( Formerly known as M/s Jai Hind Contractors Pvt. Ltd.) vs. Ambernath Municipal Council & Anr., the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has held that mere participation in arbitral proceedings does not stop a party from challenging the inherent lack of jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal in the absence of a...
Read More
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India: One-Sided Contractual Clauses Cannot Bar Legal Remedies!
M/s ABS Marine Services vs The Andaman and Nicobar Administration, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has held that contractual clauses in government agreements cannot be framed in a manner that completely bar a private party from seeking legal remedies Hon’ble Courts or Ld. Arbitral tribunals. The dispute arose from a manning agreement executed between...
Read More
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India Dishonour of Post-Dated Cheque Not Sufficient to Prove Cheating!
In V. Ganesan v. State, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has clarified that dishonour of a post-dated cheque by itself is not sufficient to presume dishonest intention so as to constitute an offence of cheating under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The case arose from a financial arrangement relating to a film...
Read More
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India Belated Jurisdictional Challenge Not Maintainable After Participation in Arbitration!
In Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. M/s R.V. Anderson Associates Limited, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has clarified that a belated jurisdictional challenge cannot be raised after a party has actively participated in arbitral proceedings without objection. The dispute arose from a consultancy agreement between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and M/s...
Read More
Hon'ble Supreme Court Holds Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Award Interest If Contract Prohibits It!
In the Union of India & Ors. v. Larsen & Turbo Limited, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has clarified the scope of an arbitral tribunal’s power to grant interest under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Supreme Court of India held that an arbitral tribunal cannot award pre-award or pendente lite interest...
Read More
Hon'ble Supreme Court Permits Withdrawal of Life Support in Vegetative State Case!
Harish Rana v. Union of India has clarified the legal position on withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in cases involving patients in a permanent vegetative state. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India permitted withdrawal of life support for a patient who had remained in a permanent vegetative state for more than thirteen years, thereby allowing passive...
Read More
upreme Court on Parallel Insolvency Proceedings: Key Takeaways from ICICI Bank v. ERA Infrastructure Case
ICICI Bank Limited vs. ERA Infrastructure (India) Limited and Connected Matters has clarified that there is no bar under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 to initiate simultaneous Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) proceedings against a corporate debtor and its corporate guarantor for the same debt. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India held that the...
Read More
1 2

Disclaimer & Confirmation

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “Accept” button below, the user acknowledges the following:

• There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation, or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website.
• The user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her own information and use.
• The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
• The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement.
• We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice, as the material contained in this document does not constitute/substitute professional advice that may be required before acting on any matter. Neither this website nor the web pages and the information contained herein constitute a contract or will form the basis of a contract. While every care has been taken in preparing the content of this website and web pages to ensure accuracy at the time of publication and creation, however, Law Chambers Of Pooja Dua assumes no responsibility for any errors, which despite all precautions may be found herein. All disputes, if any, are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of courts at New Delhi, India only.