Tag

#LegalUpdate”
Noida Authority Seals Lotus Panache Towers: A Strong Message on Compliance and Accountability
The recent action taken by the Noida Authority against the Lotus Panache real estate project marks a crucial moment in the enforcement of urban development laws and regulatory discipline. Acting against long-standing violations, the Authority sealed three under-construction residential towers and ten commercial units after discovering massive outstanding dues and unauthorized construction activities. According to...
Read More
Arbitration vs. Litigation: Choosing the Right Path
In the evolving commercial and legal landscape, disputes are inevitable but the method of resolution defines how effectively they are managed. For many, the choice between arbitration and  litigation can determine the speed, confidentiality, and enforceability of outcomes.   Both have their merits, but selecting the right path requires careful consideration of the dispute’s nature,...
Read More
Noida Residents Seek Relief from Demolition Notices for Home Extensions
  Residents across several Noida sectors have approached local authorities seeking relief from     demolition and sealing notices     issued for     minor home extensions such as verandah enclosures and small structural additions.   The notices, served under Section 10 of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, classify these additions as...
Read More
Supreme Court Upholds Sealing of Property Misused for Commercial Purpose in Delhi’s New Rajinder Nagar Market
In a recent ruling in   M.C. Mehta v. Union of India & Ors. , the Supreme Court of India upheld the sealing of a property that was originally sanctioned as a shop-cum-residence but was being misused for commercial purposes on the upper residential floors.   Main Issue:   Whether a property sanctioned for mixed...
Read More
Supreme Court on Delay and Deficiency in Arbitral Awards
In  Lancor Holdings Limited v. Prem Kumar Menon & Ors., the Hon’ble Supreme Court has set aside an arbitral award that was rendered nearly four years after the conclusion of proceedings , holding that such  inordinate delay and failure to adjudicate core disputes amounts to a violation of the public policy of India under Section...
Read More
Supreme Court safeguards advocates' rights: Protecting confidentiality in the digital age
The Supreme Court in the case Re: Summoning Advocates with Writ  Petition and Special Leave  Petition who give legal opinion or represent parties during investigation of cases  and related issues, bearing number Writ Petition (Civil) No. 632 of 2025 and SLP (Cr.) No. 9334 of 2025  has taken a significant step to protect the independence...
Read More
Protecting Homebuyers' Rights: A Landmark Judgment
Key Points of the Judgment:    –  Physical Possession After Sale : The court held that a secured creditor’s right to physical possession of a property remains intact, even if the property has been sold to a new owner. –  Role of District Magistrate : The District Magistrate’s role under Section 14 of the SARFAESI...
Read More
Engineering Projects (India) Limited v MSA Global LLC (OMAN): A Landmark Ruling on Anti-Arbitration Injunctions
The Delhi High Court’s recent judgment in  Engineering Projects (India) Limited v MSA Global LLC (OMAN)  has sent ripples through the arbitration community. In a significant development, the Hon’ble Court held that Indian civil courts can grant anti-arbitration injunctions against foreign-seated arbitrations if those proceedings are deemed vexatious, oppressive, or contrary to India’s public policy....
Read More
Stray Dogs and Urban Safety: Supreme Court’s Suo Moto Intervention on Rabies Tragedy
The Delhi High Court has recently flagged a concerning trend where affluent tenants are occupying landlords’ properties on meager rental rates. In a case involving a dispute over a monthly rent of ₹40 in the Sadar Bazar area, the court highlighted the need for a more equitable approach to rental agreements.     Case Details:    ...
Read More
Bombay High Court Ruling: Arbitral Tribunal's Obligation to Provide Reasons while dealing with Liquidated Damages
The Bombay High Court’s recent judgment in HPCL v. GR Engineering Pvt Ltd has underscored the importance of reasoned decisions in arbitration proceedings. The case involved a dispute arising from a 2006 contract between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) and GR Engineering Pvt Ltd (GRE) for the construction of LPG mounded bullets at a refinery...
Read More
1 2

Disclaimer & Confirmation

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “Accept” button below, the user acknowledges the following:

• There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation, or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website.
• The user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her own information and use.
• The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
• The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement.
• We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice, as the material contained in this document does not constitute/substitute professional advice that may be required before acting on any matter. Neither this website nor the web pages and the information contained herein constitute a contract or will form the basis of a contract. While every care has been taken in preparing the content of this website and web pages to ensure accuracy at the time of publication and creation, however, Law Chambers Of Pooja Dua assumes no responsibility for any errors, which despite all precautions may be found herein. All disputes, if any, are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of courts at New Delhi, India only.