Arbitrators play a crucial role in handling cases involving suspected fraud. According to recent expert insights, arbitrators should prioritize procedural fairness, ensuring parties are given a full and reasonable opportunity to be heard. Neutrality is also essential to maintain the integrity of the process.
When suspecting fraud, arbitrators can flag concerns but should not investigate independently. Instead, they should rely on evidence and arguments presented by the parties. Arbitrators can shape the evidentiary burden by requiring parties to produce critical documents or records.
Some key considerations for arbitrators include:
– Ensuring procedural fairness and natural justice
– Remaining impartial and neutral
– Flagging potential fraud concerns without an independent investigation
– Shaping evidentiary burdens through document production
By following these guidelines, arbitrators can effectively handle cases involving suspected fraud while maintaining the integrity of the arbitration process.
